Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 ALA 145 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably Hill v. State (1922), 49 Ala. App. 726 - Bills v. State (1973)

40 state decisions

130190119101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Winslow v. State · Orr v. State · Bones v. State · Thomas v. State · White v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the evidence affords an inference of the larceny of the goods, then the question of its sufficiency is one for the jury, and it becomes their province to determine whether the corpus delicti has been proven.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.