Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 Ariz. 282 - State v. Walton

State v. Walton’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
5
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Martin v. Reinstein (1999), State v. Robinson (1997)

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

2101982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barrett v. United States · People v. CALVAREST · State v. Arnett · State v. Kelly · State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Recklessly” means, with respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense, that a person is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such nature and degree that disregard of such risk constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the situation. A person who creates such a risk but is unaware of such risk solely by reason of voluntary intoxication also acts recklessly with respect to such risk.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person commits second degree murder if without premeditation ... [s]uch person intentionally causes the death of another person....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “that the defendant acts with either the intention or the knowledge that he will kill another human being, when such intention or knowledge precedes the killing by a length of time to permit reflection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.