Davis v. Cramer’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 1943
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Central Nat Bank v. Hume Hume · Wilks v. Vaughan · Fred v. Asbury · McKneely v. Terry · Judson v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the obvious purpose of this statute to exempt from the claims of the creditors out of the estate of the husband and father a sum not exceeding $300 to pay insurance premiums on policies issued on his life for the benefit of his wife and children.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harrison v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.