Andrus v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1961
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Unger v. Mooney · Webber v. Clarke · Halleck v. Mixer · Sheldon v. Mull · McCreery v. Everding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It has been held that where the property is in some way subjected to the will and control of the claimant, that an inclosure is not always necessary.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““And where a party enters, under color of title, and has actual possession of a part of the whole tract, he has constructive possession of the whole.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.