Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 CALAPP2D 402 - Caron v. Andrew

Caron v. Andrew’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
5
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably International Fidelity Insurance v. Wilson (1983), 170 Cal. App. 4th 229 - Shaw v. County of Santa Cruz (2008)

1 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

1201955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roesch v. De Mota · Beers v. Wolf · Ausplund v. &198tna Indemnity Co. · Klein v. J. D. & J. M. Collins · State v. Cornwall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * However, if the company, upon the default of the contractors, undertook to complete the work, a different case is then presented. In that event, the company, by such new undertaking, put itself in the place of the contractors from the moment of the new undertaking, and became liable for the costs of completing the building, without reference to the amount for which it had signed as surety. In other words, in that event, from that moment on, the company occupied the position of contractor and became liable * * *." (Emphasis supplied.) 284 P.2d at 549-50 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “One who is in reality a surety may contract as a principal. He may waive the rights which the law throws around a surety, for such a waiver has nothing in it offensive to the law; and the surety does waive such rights when he in terms contracts and agrees to be bound as the principal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.