133 Cal. App. 4th 1483 - Coburn v. Sievert’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
69 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 45 Cal. 3d 727 - Lungren v. Deukmejian · Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of Equalization · 8 Cal. 4th 791 - Ghirardo v. Antonioli · 25 Cal. 4th 268 - Day v. City of Fontana · 16 Cal. 4th 469 - Garcia v. McCutchen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ambiguous means `susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“' "extrinsic aids, including the ostensible objects to be achieved, the evils to be remedied, the legislative history, ... [and] the statutory scheme of which the statute is a part.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Issues of statutory construction as well as the application of that construction to a particular set of facts are questions of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.