133 Cal. App. 4th 328 - In Re Work Uniform Cases’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Regents of University of California v. Doe · 15 Cal. 3d 328 - Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of Glendale · Terminal Ass'n of St Louis v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen · 23 Cal. 3d 296 - Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of Sonoma · 27 Cal. 3d 690 - Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer, even though unlawful, unless the employee, at the time of obeying the directions, believed them to be unlawful.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“payment to employees for work uniforms is a part of the employees' compensation and should be considered like any other payment of wages, compensation or benefits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.