133 Cal. App. 4th 68 - In Re Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2022
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Crawford v. Washington · Gideon v. Wainwright · Teague v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“implicating the fundamental fairness and accuracy of the criminal proceeding.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“new substantive rules generally apply retroactively”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robertson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.