Rudd v. Rogerson’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 1993
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mastin v. Bartholomew · Denver Suburban Homes & Water Co. v. Fugate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The affirmation of fact in the instant case is the statement, oral and written, prior, contemporaneous and subsequent, that the cattle were registered Aberdeen Angus cattle, ■plus the detailed description of the : specific cattle. Certainly, the ‘natural tendency of such affirmation or promise’ was ‘to induce the buyer to purchase the goods * * * relying thereon.’ The object of the writing was to affirm, represent and promise, and this is all that is required.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Question to be Determined. “DID PLAINTIFF ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE CASE BASED UPON THE THEORY THAT DEFENDANT SOLD THE CATTLE IN QUESTION UNDER THE EXPRESS WARRANTY THAT THEY WERE SPECIFICALLY REGISTERED CATTLE, OR ELIGIBLE FOR REGISTRATION AS THE OFFSPRING OF IDENTIFIED ANIMALS?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rogerson v. Rudd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.