← 133 Conn. 424 - Struzinski v. Struzinsky

Struzinski v. Struzinsky’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

cited by 34 later decisions

states following

May 2013

most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Fernandes v. Rodriguez (2000), State v. Stonybrook, Inc. (1962)

33 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dawson v. Town of Orange · Paton v. Robinson · City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. Murphy · Kievman v. Grevers · Merwin v. Morris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[o]n failure of a person served with interrogatories to . . . return a sufficient answer or disclose sufficient assets for execution, or on objection by such person to the interrogatories, the judgment creditor may move the court for such supplemental discovery orders as may be necessary to ensure disclosure including . . . an order for production or for examination of the judgment debtor . . . . Further, the defendants' compliance with the post judgment interrogatories filed by the plaintiffs will in no way "affect the title or right of possession of the judgment debtor's property.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Conrad v. Erickson, No. Cv-91-69587 S (Oct. 18, 1994) · 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 4156 - Longobardi v. Blakeslee Prestress, Inc., No. 330301 (May 4, 1992)
“[t]he purpose of the statute . . . CT Page 10840 authorizing judgment liens was to provide an additional method of appropriating in satisfaction of [the] judgment real estate which could by law be taken on . . . execution. . . . The lien merely constitutes a charge upon the property . . . and the filing of the lien does not affect the title or right of possession of the judgment debtor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 10836 - Linden Condominium Ass'n. v. McKenna, No. Cv-95-0555852-S (Oct. 28, 1997)
“[P]roof of an ouster by one cotenant of another CT Page 3687 ought to be of the most satisfactory nature. Ordinarily possession of one tenant in common is possession of all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3684 - Frank v. Frank, No. 094162 (Apr. 22, 1992)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.