¶1Suit for salary. Plaintiff entitled to recover. Opinion 130 C. Cls. 567.
¶2In accordance with the opinion of the court and on a stipulation by the parties showing the amount due thereunder, judgment for the plaintiff was entered for $11,167.91.
¶3Defendant’s motion for rehearing or reconsideration overruled January 31, 1956.
¶4Retired Pay Navy Enlisted Men
¶5Following the opinion of the court in the case of Christopher C. Sanders v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 501, and upon *968stipulations of the parties showing the amounts due each of the plaintiffs for additional pay for service in the United States Navy, judgments were entered for the respective plaintiffs for the amounts stated in the several stipulations as follows:
ON NOVEMBER 8, 1955
Docket No. Number of Judgments
264r-52 1
414r-52_. 520-53. 490-54.. 1 1 4
¶6Philippines Claims Dismissed
¶7Jurisdiction; claims from Philippines.
¶8Following the opinion in Eleuterio Logronio v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 596, in which the opinion in Victorio v. Limited States, 122 C. Cls. 708, was overruled, the petitions in the following cases were dismissed, in open court, November 8, 1955, on defendant’s motions:
¶9No. 49541. Isidro Vietorio
¶10No. 69-53. Sergio Q. Pates
¶11No. 493-52. Claro S. Ong
¶12No. 97-53. Estelita L. DeSalido
¶13No. 50300 (4). Juanito P. Pastrana, et al., in ease of Gerónimo Saololo
¶14No. 50300 (12). Juanito P. Pastrana, et al., in case of Capt. Eicardo A. Pronove, et al.
¶15No. 50126 Vicenta Totengco