Rucker v. Bolles’s Empirical Analysis
133 F. 858 · 1904
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1932
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oscanyan v. Arms Co. · Milbank v. . Jones · Doon v. Smith · McKinley v. Williams · Maitland v. Zanga
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a written contract, entered into without fraud, accident, or mistake, purports upon its face to be a complete memorial of the whole agreement, the conclusive presumption is that tlie parties have written into the contract every material item and term of their engagement, and it is not permissible to contradict, vary, or add to its terms by parol evidence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.