Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 F.2d 154 - Rehm v. Interstate Motor Freight System

Rehm v. Interstate Motor Freight System’s Empirical Analysis

133 F.2d 154 · 1943

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. Miller · Colborne v. Detroit United Railway · Fike v. Pere Marquette Railroad · Cardinal v. Reinecke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[When dealing with issues of state law,] the duty of United States courts ... is to ascertain, construe and apply static state law: not to limit, modify or repeal state doctrine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.