Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 F.2d 356 - Umhau v. Bazzuro

Umhau v. Bazzuro’s Empirical Analysis

133 F.2d 356 · 1942

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Kogod v. Cogito (1952), Sanders v. Worthington (1964)

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

10019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Deregibus v. Silberman Furniture Co., Inc. · Holmes v. Turner's Falls Co. · Temple Doswell v. Enrique De La Lanza et al. · Smith v. Vermont Marble Company · Rose v. City of Farmington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] user of the type here involved, being a mere neighborly act, with no intent on the part of ... [appellees] to claim adversely, and no intent on the part of the owner to surrender, could not ripen into an easement even though no permission had ever been asked.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “open, notorious, exclusive, continuous, and adverse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.