Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 F.2d 408 - McJordan v. Huff

McJordan v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis

133 F.2d 408 · 1943

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
May 1977
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently May 1977 · most notably Dorsey v. Gill (1945), Everett v. United States (1964)

39 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1601943195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Wood v. United States · Evans v. Rives

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““in the instant case that the petitioner’s conviction was valid amounts in effect to an assertion that the constitutional guarantee that in criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to have the assistance of counsel for his defense does not apply at the arraignment, where the accused is required to stand at the bar, to hear the charge, and to enter a plea. But an accused is no less an accused at that stage of the proceedings than at any other, and, as we have pointed out above, no less in need at that stage than at any other of the assistance of counsel. The constitutional guarantee makes no distinction between the arraignment and other stages of criminal proceedings in respect of the application of the guarantee. * * * The duty upon a court of according an accused such rights is positive and affirmative and must not be ignored.” 12”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t goes without saying that a plea of guilty at that time can be and often is changed, on proper motion, as a matter of course.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.