Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 F.2d 44 - Hartman v. Lubar

Hartman v. Lubar’s Empirical Analysis

133 F.2d 44 · 1942

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
3
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Brown v. Southall Realty Company (1968), Martin v. George Hyman Construction Co. (1978)

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 48 state decisions

19019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weil v. Neary · Burck v. Taylor · Awotin v. Atlas Exchange National Bank · Embrey v. Jemison · The President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States v. William Owens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unlawful and illegal to engage in the District of Columbia in the business of loaning money upon which a rate of interest greater than six per centum per annum is charged on any security of any kind, direct or collateral, tangible or intangible, without procuring license * * *.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Rivera v. Schlick · Mary W. Royall v. Louis Yudelevit and William H. Simons
  2. “the Loan Shark Law can have no application to a case of this sort, since the act was intended to apply only to persons making small loans upon personal security, as shown by the fact that the amount of such loans is limited by the act to $200.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re Parkwood, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Parkwood, Inc. v. Equitable Life Insurance Co. In Re Parkwood, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Parkwood, Inc. v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. In Re Adams Properties, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Adams Properties, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance Co
  3. “The evidence offered was competent, therefore, to show the illegality of the transaction and the resulting absence of title in the trustee, upon which appellee based his right to possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Mary W. Royall v. Louis Yudelevit and William H. Simons

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.