Romero v. Squier’s Empirical Analysis
133 F.2d 528 · 1943
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 1986
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1488 · 10 U.S.C. § 1506
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Sorrells v. United States · Byars v. United States · In re Grimley · Dynes v. Hoover
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Munson“* * * The accused shall have the right to be represented in his defense before the court by counsel of his own selection, civil counsel if he so provides, or military if such counsel Toe reasonably available, otherwise by the defense counsel duly appointed for the court pursuant to article 11. * * * [Italics supplied.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right * * * to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.