Hepper v. Adams County’s Empirical Analysis
133 F.3d 1094 · 1998
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
March 2005
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Treleven v. University of Minnesota · Brown v. First National Bank in Lenox · Pamida, Inc. v. Meide · Douglas v. United States Tobacco Co. · Mitchell v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud, Etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a party’s legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: ... (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); ... or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Scott v. Apfel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.