Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 F.3d 1412 - United States v. Wright

United States v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

133 F.3d 1412 · 1998

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
August 2012
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably United States v. Cunningham (1998), Gillespie v. City of Indianapolis (1999)

25 federal appellate · 1 district ·

200199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB · Jusino v. Brown · United States v. Scroggins · United States v. Calhoon · United States v. Henry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because such a holding would create constitutional infirmities in the Sentencing Guidelines, other circuits have concluded that legal challenges alone cannot form the basis for a denial of a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “the district court should not deny the reduction for acceptance simply because the defendant challenges a legal conclusion drawn from the facts the defendant admits”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.