Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 F.3d 608 - United States v. Eagle

United States v. Eagle’s Empirical Analysis

133 F.3d 608 · 1998

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
May 2020
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably United States v. Gabe (2001), United States v. Brooks (1999)

23 federal appellate ·

1201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · Attwood v. Singletary · United States v. Fire Thunder · United States v. Turner · United States v. Suppenbach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The verdict must be upheld if there is an interpretation of the evidence that would allow a reasonable jury to conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Decisions regarding credibility of witnesses are to be resolved in favor of the jury's verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We rejected a similar argument in United States v. Eagle, 133 F.3d 608 , 611 (8th Cir. 1998): 7 The trial court found that Eagle had serious health problems, but specifically found”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the defendant overcomes, restrains, or injures the victim or if the defendant uses a threat of harm sufficient to coerce or compel submission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.