Heimann’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Ajaj v. United States (2008), 2009 OK CIV APP 101 - Raven Resources, L.L.C. v. Legacy Bank (2009)
4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard · Cold Metal Process Company v. United Engineering & Foundry Company · Lewis v. Bf Goodrich Company · Cook v. Rocky Mountain Bank Note Co. · Tma Fund, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. James Biever and Pamela Biever
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the matter is now final and immediately appealable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Heimann v. Snead · Heimann v. Snead“the court . . . direct[s] the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.