Loving v. Boren’s Empirical Analysis
133 F.3d 771 · 1998
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2020
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Phelps v. Hamilton · Committee to Save the Rio Hondo v. Lucero · 956 F. Supp. 953 - Loving v. Boren
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]owhere did plaintiff adduce evidence that he suffered any injury in fact as a result of the University's new policy.... Plaintiff simply presented no evidence that he ever attempted to access news groups through the full service news server and was denied access....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morgan v. McCotter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.