Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

133 F.3d 921

Docket No. 96-3924.

Bell v. Schriro Mo

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-12-19

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 1999 · most notably Tanya Mixon v. The State of Ohio and Michael White (1999), Bradley v. Work (1998)

24 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Preiser v. Rodriguez

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1997-12-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Eddie Bell appeals from the dismissal by the District Court1 of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. The District Court determined that although Bell framed his complaint as a § 1983 action, what he sought was a shorter sentence. Because such relief must be sought through a petition for a writ of habeas corpus after exhaustion of state court remedies, see Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 489 (1973), the District Court dismissed Bell's claim without prejudice. After a careful review of the record and the parties' submissions on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri

/133/f3d/921 · .json · Public domain