Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

133 F.3d 928

Docket No. 97-16469.

Nite v. Adams

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Dec. 15, 1997** Decided Dec. 17, 1997.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-12-17

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Tripati v. Henman · Roselle v. United States Department of the Interior

Decided 1997-12-17

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before SNEED, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM*

STRAND

¶2

Federal prisoner Rob Nite appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed June 5, 1997. See Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.1988).

¶3

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

/133/f3d/928 · .json · Public domain