Harter Tomato Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
133 F.3d 934 · 1998
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Penrod v. National Labor Relations Board (2000), Perdue Farms, Inc., Cookin' Good Division v. National Labor Relations Board (1998)
32 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. · Brooks v. National Labor Relations Board · Golden State Bottling Company Inc v. National Labor Relations Board · Ford Motor Company v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hether the business of both employers is essentially the same; whether the employees of the new company are doing the same jobs in the same working conditions under the same supervisors; and whether the new entity has the same production process, produces the same products, and basically has the same body of customers.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]e ask not whether [petitioner's] view of the facts supports its version of what happened, but rather whether the Board's interpretation of the facts is reasonably defensible.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]o objection that has not been urged before the Board ... shall be considered by the court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of extraordinary circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.