Caetano v. Shaughnessy’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1001 · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Harisiades v. Shaughnessy · United States Bilokumsky v. Tod · Helena Bugajewitz v. Louis Adams D C · Henry Heide, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · United States ex rel. Zapp v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sufficient - answer to this position is that the courts lave uniformly held to the contrary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. PANG
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.