Muwekma Tribe v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
28 district ·
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1601 (Alaska Native and American Indian Direct Reimbursement Act of 2000) · 25 U.S.C. § 2 · 25 U.S.C. § 3001 (§ 2 of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 555 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Catlin v. United States · Morton v. Mancari · Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co. · Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications Commission · Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]nterlocutory judgments are not brought within the restrictions of [Rule 60(b) ], but rather they are left subject to the complete power of the court rendering them to afford such relief from them as justice requires.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.