State v. Acker.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Chambers v. Mississippi · California v. Trombetta · Rock v. Arkansas · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] fundamental element of due process of law is the right of compulsory process. The right to compulsory process affords a defendant in all criminal prosecutions, not only the power to compel attendance of witnesses, but also the right to have those witnesses heard.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he Sixth Amendment requires that a witness be brought to court, but it does not require that he take the stand after refusing to testify. Once a witness appears in court and refuses to testify, a defendant’s compulsory process rights are exhausted. It is irrelevant whether the witness’s refusal is grounded in a valid Fifth Amendment privilege, an invalid privilege, or something else entirely.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is relevant if it has ' any tendency to support an inference of the witness' disposition or tendency, consciously or unconsciously, to slant testimony one way or the other, from the straight and true.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Brown.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.