State v. Hern’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on United States v. Taylor · State v. Estencion · State v. Moriwake · United States v. Miller · United States v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly articulate the effect of the . . . factors [set forth in Estencion, 63 Haw. at 269 , 625 P.2d at 1044 ] and any other factor it considered in rendering its decision”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barua · State v. Barua“clearly articulate the effect of the Estencion factors and any other factor it considered in rendering its decision.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[ (1) ] the seriousness of the offense; [ (2) ] the facts and the circumstances of the case which led to the dismissal; and [ (3) ] the impact of a reprosecution on the administration of [HRPP Rule 48 ] and on the administration of justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Muzik · State v. Lungoci
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.