Loein C. Collins, Judge, presiding. The following is a sufficiently full and accurate statement of this case, prepared by the Appellate Court, and the opinion of that court thereon: “Appellants filed a creditor’s hill, in which, after alleging the recovery of a judgment against said appellee Nilsson, and the return of an execution issued thereon, no part satisfied, it is further alleged, that April 5, 1888, and for some time prior to that date, the defendant, Nilsson, was…
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1The questions presented in this case have been thoroughly considered, both in this and kindred cases, and we are entirely satisfied with the correctness of the views of the Appellate Court, as expressed by Mr. Justice Moran in the foregoing opinion. Like ruling will be found in Weber v. Mick, 131 Ill. 520.
¶2The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.