Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 Ind. 358 - Ogle v. Edwards

Ogle v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 1950
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1950

17 state decisions

401893190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hines v. Driver · Shoemaker v. Smith · Krutz v. Howard · Redman v. State · Bernhamer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The mode and time of making the application may be regulated by a rule of court, but such right of the party can not be abrogated or obstructed in such a way as to prevent the exercise of it by a rule of court, for the statutory right is paramount to any rule.” Ogle et al. v. Edwards, Administrator (1892), 133 Ind. 358 , 33 N. E. 95 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.