Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 KAN 268 - Rouse v. Taylor

Rouse v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1948
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Wellman · National Bank of America v. Home Security Co. · Beeler v. Beezley · Caple v. Drew · Martin v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . If there is doubt as to the jurisdiction of a court of general jurisdiction with reference to a judgment rendered by it, the presumption is always in favor of its jurisdiction (Bank v. Security Co., 65 Kan. 642 , 70 Pac. 646 ), and the same rule extends to the judgments of the probate court (Watkins v. Mullen, 62 Kan. 1 , 61 Pac. 385 ).” (p. 272.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.