State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1945
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stephens v. Ballou · Gilbert v. Craddock · Fuller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Kansas Breeze Co. v. Edwards · Lauer v. Livings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In order that a specific provision of a legislative act be repealed by the implication arising from the passage of a subsequent act, such subsequent act must contain that which was clearly intended to take the place of such specific provision.” (Gilbert v. Craddock, 67 Kan. 346 , Syl. ¶ 1, 72 Pac. 869 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marshall v. Marshall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.