Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 La. 44 - Cunningham v. Steidman

Cunningham v. Steidman’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 1985
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1985

17 state decisions

5019131920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gilmer v. O'Neal · Gibson v. Foster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The plaintiff contends that the said provision of the Constitution taking away from the courts all authority to cause a homestead to be sold being a prohibitory law, and, whatever is done in violation of a prohibitory law being null and void, said sheriff's sale is null and void.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.