Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

133 Mass. 559

Schramm v. Stephan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 17, 1882

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1882-11-17

Complaint under the bastardy act, Gen. Sts. c. 72. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Gardner, J., the complainant introduced evidence tending to show that, on November 6, 1881, she was delivered of a child, which was begotten by the respondent on or about March 6, 1881; and that she never saw the child, and was unconscious at the time of the delivery.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1911

2 state decisions

Relies on Commonwealth v. Cole

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1882-11-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.

¶1Our statute, as the title implies, is designed to make provision for “ the maintenance of bastard children.” The only order which the court can pass is that the adjudged father “shall stand charged with the maintenance thereof, with the assistance of the mother, in such manner as the court shall order; and shall give bond with sufficient sureties to perform said order, and also to indemnify and save harmless against all charges of maintenance her parents and any city or town or the State chargeable with the maintenance of such child.” Gen. Sts. c. 72. Pub. Sts. c. 85. Until born, the child is not the subject of maintenance. It is clear that the statute applies only to the case of a bastard child born alive, and not to a case like the present one, of a still-born child. The only order the court can issue, applied to the last-named case, would be inoperative and absurd. Commonwealth v. Cole, 5 Mass. 517.

¶2Exceptions overruled.

/133/mass/559 · .json · Public domain