Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 Md. 579 - Stem v. Crawford

Stem v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 1957
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Praeger v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. · Davis v. McFarlane · Dinsmore v. Maag-Wahmann Co. · Philbrook v. Belknap · Crane v. Gough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a person having sold goods continues in possession of the goods, or of negotiable documents of title to the goods, the delivery or transfer by that person, or by an agent acting for him, of the goods or documents of title under any sale, pledge or other disposition thereof, to any person receiving and paying value for the same in good faith and without notice of the previous sale, shall have the same effect as if the person making the delivery or transfer were expressly authorized by the owner of the goods to make the same.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.