Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 Md. App. 358 - Ruth v. State

133 Md. App. 358 - Ruth v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Holloway v. Arkansas · McGee v. County of Orange · Breast Implant Tort Represented By O'Quinn v. Dow Corning Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appellate review of a trial attorney's conduct is best done in a post-conviction proceeding, rather than on direct appeal, where a trial-like setting will 'provide[ ] the opportunity to develop a full record concerning relevant factual issues,’ ” the Court of Special Appeals, nevertheless, decided to review the issue because, at the defendant’s motion for a new trial hearing,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.