Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 Md. App. 97 - Graves v. State

133 Md. App. 97 - Graves v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 14071 (§ 170101 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Williams v. People of State of New York · Montgomery County v. Buckman · Jones v. State · Logan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2)(i) Has been convicted of violating § 35C of this article for an offense involving sexual abuse; (ii) Has been convicted of violating any of the provisions of §§ 462 through 464B of this article for an offense involving an individual under the age of 15 years; (iii) Has been granted probation before judgment after being found guilty of any of the offenses listed in items (i) and (ii) of this paragraph and has been ordered by the court, as a condition of probation, to comply with the requirements of this section; (iv) Has been convicted of, or granted probation before judgment after being found guilty of, violating § 464C of this article and has been ordered by the court, as a part of a sentence or condition of probation, to comply with the requirements of this section; (v) Has been found not criminally responsible for any of the offenses listed in items (i) and (ii) of this section; or (vi) Has been convicted in another state of an offense that, if committed in this state, would constitute one of the offenses listed in items (i) and (ii) of this paragraph.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is clear that the legislature intended a broad and sweeping registration of sexual offenders. In addition, a sexually violent predator is, in essence, a sexually violent offender who has committed a second sexually violent offense and who has been determined to be at risk of committing a subsequent sexually violent offense. Accordingly, we decline to read the statute as prohibiting a sentencing court from considering out-of-state convictions when it determines if an individual is a sexually violent predator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(i) A violation of any of the provisions of § 462, § 463, § 464, § 464A, § 464B, or § 464F of this article; or (ii) Assault with intent to commit rape in the first or second degree or a sexual offense in the first or second degree as previously proscribed under former § 12 of this article.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.