Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 MINN 86 - Hoff v. Hoff

Hoff v. Hoff’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 1960
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1960

8 state decisions

30191619201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haskell v. Haskell · McClure v. Bruck · Nell v. Dayton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * It is apparent that the exception referred to in section 7786, G. S. 1913 [M. S. A. 544.32], is confined to that part of the decree in a divorce action which deals with the marriage status and does not embrace the parts which relate to the custody of the children or to alimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.