Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

133 Misc. 832

Brotzman v. Lindenfeld

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1929-04-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1934

1 state decisions

Relies on City of Rochester v. . Campbell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-04-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The sole claim of negligence herein was that the defendant, an abutting owner, permitted snow and ice to accumulate on a coal hole cover in the highway in front of his premises. The *833snow and ice were normal accumulations. Negligence cannot be predicated on the failure of the abutting owner to remove such accumulation, even though there is a city ordinance requiring the owner to remove it. (City of Rochester v. Campbell, 123 N. Y. 405; Tremblay v. Harmony Mills, 171 id. 598; Lee v. Ortiz, 249 id. 613; Thomp. Neg. § 1219.)

¶2Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

¶3All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Petebs, JJ.

/133/misc/832 · .json · Public domain