Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 N.C. 587 - Wadsworth v. Concord.

Wadsworth v. Concord.’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
February 1947
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1947

6 state decisions

2019031910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zottman v. City & County of San Francisco · Thrift v. . Elizabeth City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Respecting the mode in which contracts by corporations should be made, it is important to observe that when, as is sometimes the case, the mode of contracting is specially and plainly prescribed and limited, that mode is exclusive and must be pursued, or the contract will not bind the corporation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.