133 N.C. App. 195 - State v. Wilds’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
December 2013
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Henderson v. Brown · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co. · First National Bank v. United States · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department · State v. Coffey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[although statements that relate only factual events do not fall within the Rule 803(3) exception, statements relating factual events which tend to show the victim’s state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition when the victim made the statements are not excluded if the facts related by the victim serve to demonstrate the basis for the victim’s state of mind, emotions, sensations, or physical condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]his case is distinguishable from Hardy in that the statements in Hardy were taken from the victim’s diary and contained descriptions of assaults and threats against the victim before she died but did not reveal the victim’s state of mind or contain statements of the victim’s fear of defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.