133 N.C. App. 47 - State v. Baggett’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on DiDonato v. Wortman · 92 N.C. App. 331 - Kimmel v. Brett · 67 N.C. App. 341 - Avco Financial Services v. Isbell · State v. Rose · Davidson County v. City of High Point
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) ... [T]he scope of review on appeal is confined to a consideration of those assignments of error set out in the record on appeal in accordance with this Rule 10. . . . (c) (1) . . . Each assignment of error shall, so far as practicable, be confined to a single issue of law; and shall state plainly, concisely and without argumentation the legal basis upon which error is assigned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[o]ne purpose of [Rule 10] is to `identify for the appellee's benefit all the errors possibly to be urged on appeal ... so that the appellee may properly assess the sufficiency of the proposed record on appeal to protect his position.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.