Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 NH 631 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2018

22 state decisions

120199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Rose v. Clark · Thompson v. Thompson · State v. Ball

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he jury was never instructed on the definition of deadly weapon[,] ... its verdict was necessarily incomplete and 'akin to the direction of a verdict for the prosecution on an element of the offense charged,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Errors that partially or completely deny a defendant the right to the basic trial process, such as the complete denial of a defendant's right to counsel, or adjudication by a biased judge, rise to the level of fundamental unfairness, thereby obviating consideration of the harmless error doctrine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The fourteenth amendment [to the United States Constitution] and part I, article 15 [of the New Hampshire Constitution] have been interpreted as entitling a criminal defendant to a jury determination on all factual elements of the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.