State v. Galloway’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 135 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 137 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Commonwealth v. Eichinger (2007), State v. Lapointe (1996)
2 federal appellate · 135 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Enmund v. Florida · Frazier v. Cupp · Blackburn v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 137 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] court must look at the totality of the circumstances, including both the characteristics of the defendant and the nature of the interrogation. Relevant factors to be considered include the suspect’s age, education and intelligence, advice concerning constitutional rights, length of detention, whether the questioning was repeated and prolonged in nature, and whether physical punishment and mental exhaustion were involved. [Ibid, (citing Schneckloth v. Bustamante, 412 U.S. 218, 226 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2047-48 , 36 L.Ed. 2d 854, 862 (1973) and State v. Miller, 76 N.J. 392, 402 , 388 A.2d 218 (1978)).]”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Ejxperts in the psychological field believe that that kind of mental deficiency can affect a person’s cognitive faculties, and the record contains evidence that the claimed deficiency did affect the defendant’s cognitive capacity to form the mental state necessary for the commission of the crime. [State v. Galloway, 133 N.J. 631, 647 , 628 A.2d 735 (1993).]”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kotter · State v. Bauman“disease or defect which would negate a state of mind which is an element of the offense.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.