Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 N.J. Super. 180 - State v. Thompson

133 N.J. Super. 180 - State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Cuyler v. Adams (1981), 329 Pa. Super. 490 - Commonwealth v. Carter (1984)

3 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

9019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Schilb v. Kuebel · David v. Vesta Co. · New Jersey Chapter, American Institute of Planners v. New Jersey State Board of Professional Planners · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment goes no further than to prohibit invidious discrimination. . . . If there is some reasonable basis for the recognition of separate classes, and if the disparate treatment of the classes has a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the lawmakers, the Constitution is not offended. The transgression arises only when the classification rests upon grounds wholly irrelevant to achievement of the State's objective; the separate treatment must admit of but one conclusion beyond a rational doubt, i.e., that the basis therefore is arbitrary and unreasonable and without relevance to the legislative goal.' "”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.