Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 N.M. 516 - State v. Cardenas

State v. Cardenas’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Spingola v. Spingola · State v. Mascarenas · State v. Eden · State v. Vigil · State v. LeFebre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is not the function of a reviewing court to substitute its own interpretation of a local rule for that of the court which promulgated the rule[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is a bright-line rule, designed to assure prompt disposition of criminal cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The district court's application of Rule 5-604 is subject to de novo review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.