133 Ohio App. 3d 409 - State v. Barcus Wheatley’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Toledo's Great Eastern Shoppers City, Inc. v. Abde's Black Angus Steak House No. III, Inc. · State v. Chippendale · State v. Volpe · 105 Ohio App. 3d 504 - State v. Sufronko · 63 Ohio App. 3d 91 - State v. Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a general provision conflicts with a special or local provision, they shall be construed, if possible, so that effect is given to both. If the conflict between the provisions is irreconcilable, the special or local provision prevails as an exception to the general provision, unless the general provision is the later adoption and the manifest intent is that the general provision prevail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n determining whether R.C. 1.51 applies, we must first ascertain whether the statutes are in irreconcilable conflict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.