133 Ohio App. 3d 555 - State v. Booth’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2025
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jenks · State v. Dehass · 90 Ohio App. 3d 124 - State v. Gregory · 16 Ohio App. 3d 243 - State v. Hardin · 84 Ohio App. 3d 534 - State v. Workman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of circumstances when he is aware that such circumstances probably exist.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he act of firing a weapon in a place where one or more persons face a risk of injury supports an inference that a defendant acted knowingly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“must be inferred from the totality of the circumstances surrounding the alleged offense. See State v. Booth (1999), 133 Ohio App.3d 555 , 562 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.