133 Ohio App. 3d 585 - Thomas v. Price’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Seeley v. Expert, Inc. · State ex rel. Ives v. Choate · 77 Ohio App. 3d 426 - Parks v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Bryant v. Dayton Casket Co. · 54 Ohio App. 2d 25 - Garrett v. Garrett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(B) Upon reinstatement of a corporation[ ] * * *, both of the following apply to the exercise of or an attempt to exercise any rights, privileges, or franchises, including entering into or performing any contracts, on behalf of the corporation by an officer, agent, or employee of the corporation, after cancellation and prior to reinstatement * * *: (1) The exercise of or an attempt to exercise any rights, privileges, or franchises on behalf of the corporation by the officer, agent, or employee of the corporation has the same force and effect that the exercise of or an attempt to exercise the right, privilege, or franchise would have had if the corporation[ ] * * * had not been canceled, if both of the following apply: (a) The exercise of or an attempt to exercise the right, privilege, or franchise was within the scope of the *Page 32 corporation's articles of incorporation that existed prior to cancellation; (b) The officer, agent, or employee had no knowledge that the corporation[ ] * * * had been canceled. (2) The corporation is liable exclusively for the exercise of or an attempt to exercise any rights, privileges, or franchises on behalf of the corporation by an officer, agent, or employee of the corporation, if the conditions set forth in divisions (B)(1)(a) and (b) of this section are met. * * * (D) This section is remedial in nature and is to be construed liberally to accomplish the purpose of providing full reinstatement of a corporation[ ] * * * retroactive, in accor”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shows a legislative intent to validate all actions of the corporation taken during the period from the cancellation * * * to * * * reinstatement, as long as the two conditions set forth in subsection (B)(1) are met.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.